Showing posts with label Environmental/Green. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environmental/Green. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

SEATTLE RECYCLING GETS EASIER AND GREENER

This time next year, city leaders say, Seattle residents will be able to toss meat and dairy scraps into yard-waste containers and quit separating recyclable materials under new solid-waste contracts.

The new solid-waste collection contracts with Waste Management Inc. and Seattle-based newcomer CleanScrapes bring these changes in garbage and recyclables services:

  • All single-family homes will be offered weekly instead of the current biweekly food and yard-waste collection, which will include for the first time meat and dairy scraps. The food waste will be turned into compost for local parks and gardens. That is expected to halve the 45,000 tons of food waste annually going to landfills.

    Residents who don't pay for yard-waste pickup could dump food scraps into a sealable container.

  • Recyclable glass no longer will have to be separated from recyclable paper and plastics, and more kinds of plastics -- including plastic cups and deli containers, but not foam -- will become recyclable.
  • The new collection contracts will expand the city's Dumpster-Free Alley plan, which is designed to cut illegal activity around trash bins and reduce waste in alleys and business areas.
  • Sixty percent of the collection trucks will run on a bio-diesel blend, and 40 percent will run on compressed natural gas, expected to dramatically reduce pollutants.
Read more about it in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.



[Thanks Chic]

DAILY FOOTPRINT: APRIL 1, 2008

Today marks the first day of spring for me; and while spring has already officially been here for a few days, today is the day every year that I feel like waking up to a new me, a new world, a new lifestyle. April 1st is my personal New Year's, when I make my resolutions to get outside, enjoy everything around me, be more conscientious, be a better friend, be more involved in all kinds of endeavors. In the spirit of spring, the success of the recent Earth Hour, the upcoming Earth Day, and the current trend of green-everything, today prompted me to start a new "eco-diary" that focuses on what I am doing each day to reduce my worldly footprint, in hopes that it gives you some inspiration that small steps taken by each individual each day will make a huge impact over time. Your feedback and opinions are more than welcome; your snarky comments on how "nothing ever makes a difference" are not.

Today started with me waking up at a decent hour, 8:45 a.m. I eventually want this time to be 7 a.m., but that is difficult for me, seeing that I have another job that keeps me up until the wee hours of the morning on certain days of the week. Waking up early is a small thing that you may feel is nothing, but that is not so. By waking up early, I am setting my biological clock to ebb and flow with the daylight, in hopes of using less electricity at night with my computer, my lights, and my gas/heat, as well as curbing those late night munchies that make me eat more than I should, consuming more products and causing more product waste. The sunlight works with my endorphins to make me happier and more productive, burning more calories, staying healthier, and being kinder to others. Today was a gorgeous spring day, so I kicked open the curtains and the windows to let the sun naturally warm and light my house, and I turned off the heat.

Next comes bathroom time, and it's a shower day. I only shower every three or four days; you might think that's gross, but it saves water, and my body [and hair!] just doesn't need it any more than that. Next comes another thing you might think is gross: I pee in the shower. This saves an entire flush of water and a fistful of toilet paper, and, if you think about it, I am using the shower water anyway, I am going to wash myself cleaner than any toilet paper can, everything will go down the drain, and nothing extra was wasted. I find that pure genius. :) So I shower only a few minutes; just long enough to wake up and get me clean, and I only use a small amount of all the products so as not to go through them as quickly or to make unnecessary waste/production. Today, there are two new shower revelations that I am implementing to make a greener existence: no more shower gel and no more washcloths. Shower gel is a ridiculous amount of plastic packaging waste. A lot goes into making a plastic bottle, resulting in serious amounts of ripping materials from the earth, chemicals used in both the final result and the product, itself, and air pollution from factories, and for what? So I can have a soap in liquid form? The same thing as the bar, with just some water and other chemicals added that I don't need? A bar of natural soap does the same trick with less packaging, production, and chemical waste, and is usually in a recyclable box. And as for the washcloth, it is just a product that I do not need; it is one more item that I have to wash, adding to detergent, water, and energy waste in my laundry, and it is one more item that I would constantly have to re-purchase when the old one wears out, adding to unnecessary consumerism. The bar of soap foams up fine all on its own.

The next revelation in the bathroom is deciding not to use the overhead light on the sink, except only to do close-up face pampering; there is rarely any need to have two lights on in a bathroom if you are not doing close-up work, like shaving, applying make-up, plucking brows, etc. This also leads me to the fact that, as my bulbs burn out one by one, they are being replaced by only 40- and 60-watt energy saver bulbs. Anything over that is just unnecessary in the home.

Next comes brushing the teeth. Small pea-sized amounts of toothpaste are all that is necessary to create the needed foam to cleanse your teeth, anything over that amount just uses up your toothpaste unnecessarily fast, leading to more purchasing/production of the product. When you brush, also be sure only to turn the water on when spitting/rinsing brush, etc. Don't just let beautiful, clean water run down your drain for no reason.

And then sweet breakfast! Don't skip breakfast! A high fiber cereal curbs my hunger for the rest of the day, leading to less consumption, less product waste. My cereal box and my milk container are both recyclable; although today, as I ran out of milk, I decided to keep my milk container for an art project instead, cutting it open for a springtime planter, recycling the top half and keeping the bottom. My breakfast is my "green meal," where I read my email and my feed reader with just the charged computer battery and no plug-in. I drink my first of my 10 glass maximum for daily water [I have decided that more than that just becomes waste of fresh water; yes, my body likes it, but it only requires ten big glasses, so the rest is excess], and I drink juice in the morning. I have a Brita filter, and I strongly suggest anyone who drinks bottled water to get one; bottled water is a massive waste of plastic and packaging, and, although it is a stroke of marketing genius convincing you that you need it, bottled water is a highly unnecessary product. I do think the Brita filter is a good idea, though, for my health and the taste of my water; and since I make art projects out of the old filters, there isn't much waste. Juice is the only other refrigerated drink I purchase because plastic waste and chemical usage is such a threat to our planet [please forgive me for sounding like some sort of hippie... I really am not at all, haha, just trying to make a difference where and when I can], and I only buy juice in a recyclable container. One change I have made recently is with our orange juice container; we used to get a waxy, cardboard container that couldn't be recycled. Yes, the juice was delicious, but not at the throw-away cost; so we started buying juice in a recyclable container. And then, there is the coffee filter. I go out of my way to purchase non-bleached paper coffee filters in a recyclable package, and I refuse to purchase coffee from a coffee shop to avoid paying extra money for extra packaging that just gets tossed. If more people made more coffee at home in their ceramic mugs, think what a difference that would make in coffee cup waste, especially Styrofoam products, which I am adamantly against.

I wash my dishes immediately after breakfast, and I am very careful about wasting water. I do not plug my sink drain and run a whole bunch of water, and I do not just let my water run over the dishes; both of those methods are extremely wasteful. I run enough water to wet my dish, turn the water off, suds up the dish with my soap, clean it, and then rinse it off. Water on, water off. I wash my own dishes, never using a wasteful dishwasher that seldom gets dishes clean, and I let them air dry, never using unnecessary heat energy to dry something that will dry on its own, and not using paper or cloth towels to dry them, since that makes paper waste and/or detergent/laundry waste in the future.

The next big task is lunch, later in the day. I decide to eat out because I don't have much food in the house presently, and it's a beautiful day, so I want to go out. I walk. At lunch, I give myself only one napkin. One of my biggest pet peeves since working in a restaurant is people who will take handfuls of napkins just to wipe their mouths once. Not only is this expensive for the restaurant, which drives the cost of the food you love up and up, but napkins contain an enormous amount of bleaching chemicals and, of course, trees. Please don't waste them. Think small to think big. The next preaching moment for restaurant patronage is do not touch things you do not need; don't dump salt on the table just to do it, don't rip up the coasters that bars reuse, don't shred a napkin just because you're fidgity, don't take the sugar packets just to write a phone number, don't empty out gobs of ketchup at once and then only use a fraction of it, don't ask for an extra receipt if you are only going to leave it on the table. If you want mayo on your sandwich, ask for it when ordering, so as not to waste extra ramekins and packets. If you don't need the silverware in the roll-up, don't touch it or move it so they don't have to wash it. I think you can see what I mean.

So I used one napkin. And I drank one glass of water. I am only allowed one glass of water when I go out; pace yourself, drink slower. People who just drink gobs of water are wasting water, too, despite how good it might be for you. The water helps you digest, but seriously, one or two glasses max during your meal. I ask for no straw so that I do not waste a straw; straws are one of the leading causes of lip wrinkles as you get older, f.y.i., and the water touching my lips adds a nice amount of moisture, not to mention that I am not wasting one more small piece of plastic. I only eat what I need; I do not stuff myself, so that I can take some home and not consume more later, and I do not leave a bunch of food on my plate, which is equally as wasteful; rather, I eat leftovers. Normally, I package my leftovers up myself in my napkin so as not to use a separate container, and then I put them in a reusable container once I get home. Today my napkin was pretty soiled, however, so I needed a container. When the girl packaged it up, I told her that I only wanted the small container, and I did not want it put inside an additional bag. There is no need for an additional bag, so I don't want or need to waste one, even though both are recyclable, which is a start, but using them more than necessary leads to more being produced, and the endless circle of production. When I pay, I leave a nice tip, an overly nice tip: on a $10.40 bill, I left $15. Why? Because THAT is what stimulates the economy in my little big town. I bought local food, handmade at a local, independently-owned deli, and I tipped a server who will go out and spend the money in our little big town. But more than that. I just told her that I couldn't have any more water because I didn't want to waste it, I didn't want a straw because I didn't want to waste it, and not to put my to-go food in multiple containers inside a bag because I didn't want to waste it. Hopefully some of that wears off on her the next time she eats her own food at a restaurant... as well as a nice tip making someone's day, making her smile, and making her pass the good cheer, and maybe the new way of thinking, onto others.

After that, off to the grocery store. I shop locally, and I try to buy locally, and, of course, I walk to the store. I need toilet paper and laundry detergent. I buy the store brand toilet paper because it is the most basic, closest-to-just-plain-paper paper that you can buy. The super expensive ultra soft stuff has multiple sheets, adding to bigger waste, tons of chemicals and bleaches added, and extra materials causing a slow breakdown of the waste in sewage landfills. Plus, the store brand goes back into helping my little store, which helps my little big town's economy. Now detergent: I need a package that provides the least amount of waste for the same ounce size. I go out of my way to go to this store because I know they carry my brand, Seventh Generation Free & Clear Natural Laundry Detergent. Detergents are killer to the environment, waterways, and your health. Be careful what you buy, and read up on them. I make sure I use concentrated so I only need to use a smidgen, and it cleans just as well as non-concentrated. So I grab my toilet paper and detergent and head for the counter with only toilet paper and detergent; I do not take extra time to go shopping for other things that I don't need, thus avoiding that never-ending cycle of consumerism. No receipt (this awesome place doesn't print you one unless you ask for it) and no bag. I try to carry absolutely everything I can with no bag, whenever possible, even if it's a long walk home. If I need a bag, it's paper that I can use for recycling my other paper and cardboard, whenever possible.

It is now late evening, and I am using only my computer and implementing my one-light rule, drinking my eighth or ninth glass of water, and enjoying the night breeze coming through the open window, and I feel great for having been so conscientious during the day. Hopefully this eco-diary inspired you, as well.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

EARTH HOUR: CUT YOUR POWER, HELP STOP GLOBAL WARMING

Help your city join in the fight for global warming awareness across the world by flipping your switches off on Saturday, March 29, 2008, at 8:oo p.m., in support of Earth Hour, an amazing idea that started in Sydney, Australia, in 2007, with 2.2 million people and 2,100 businesses cutting their power for an hour.

The idea is now going international, with hundreds of cities worldwide participating [see all the major ones on the website, although there are hundreds more that are not listed, probably including yours: contact your local environmental city official for more details in your city.] Major US landmarks, including the Golden Gate Bridge, the Sears Tower, Niagara Falls, Wrigley Field, and the Coca-Cola sign in Times Square will turn off non-essential lighting. The point is not so much to cut power costs, but to remind people that the electricity that lights your lights can contribute to global warming. [citation]

If you want to participate, join us in shutting the power out: your lights, your computer, your TV, everything, on March 29, 2008, at 8:00 p.m., wherever you are in the world. It might not make a huge change, but it will make a huge statement. If you want cool tips and info, sign up here.

[In addition and in lieu of the idiotic responses I have seen on comments to various posts like this, I don't want to hear responses about how it isn't going to help global warming, because every little bit helps, even symbolic gestures that may raise awareness to someone who may have had no previous knowledge. Second of all, I don't want to hear anyone's religious or non-scientific opinion about how global warming doesn't exist, because science (and a recent large ice chunk) would like to disagree with you, as would I. And third, we are here to report cool happenings, events, environmental/political activities: do or don't participate, but be wary of judging others who do participate, lest you look like a hypocrite for supporting your own causes and agendas, and yes, we all have them.]




Add this event to your Google or Outlook calendar
[Thanks Chris]

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

THORN TO BE WILD: YOUNG FILMMAKERS HELP OUT NATURE

Carey Christie, filmmaker and Captain Awesome of all things artistic in Seattle, has just finished the editing of an amazing film project overseeing high school students filming, editing, and producing a nature documentary about the efforts of the Nature Consortium (featuring Restoration Project Coordinator and nature extraordinaire, buphalo) to reintroduce biodiversity in the Duwamish greenbelt of Seattle. There will probably be several screenings of the film, called Thorn To Be Wild, around the Seattle area in the coming months, and it is sure to make news as eco-everything creeps more and more into the mindset of everyone. Shown here are the rough cut and the "making of," both available on YouTube; the final cut will be available on YouTube shortly.

rough cut:



making of:


[Thanks Zoey]

Monday, March 24, 2008

PUBLIC EVENTS CALENDAR AND ACTIVITIES LISTINGS

WE WANT YOUR EVENTS:

The idea behind the public events calendar [see it] is that it is a directory of events for you, of you, by you. We want your artistic events, so let us know what is happening in your area, no matter how big or small.

Each listing on the calendar starts off with the closest largest city, if the event is not nationwide, so you can see at a glance if the event is applicable to you. The arrow in the upper right of the calendar screen gives you a dropdown key of calendar subjects by color, so you can narrow the calendar down to show only events that are important to you.

This calendar is a free, great, public place to list your artistic, social, political, or scientific event. Here's how:

Email us with:

  • Closest big city to the event, if it is not national or Internet-based
  • The who
  • The what
  • The where, as exact as possible
  • The when, including time and time zone, and if the event repeats, etc.
  • The why
  • The how
  • A copy of a flier or photo, if you have one, and photo credit name/link
  • Any links/contact info where people can go to find more info
  • Other necessary info: cost, 21+, sponsors, parking, etc.

Your event will show up as soon as we can upload it! We do reserve the right to refuse to list someone's event if it doesn't comply with our standards, ethics, or general overall good-for-the-peeps gut feeling, but if you're being cool, then we probably won't refuse it. Send in as many as you want (but please check to see if they are already listed, first! No repeats!)

Sunday, March 23, 2008

ZIPCAR DRIVE-IN: DONATE YOUR CAR FOR A CAUSE

It may be hard to think green with temps hovering around the freezing mark every night, but you can be green (and warm) by joining the cool folks of Zipcar at the Zipcar Drive-In, a free film screening event where Bostonians drive in, but don't drive out!

For the screening, Zipcar has partnered with the National Geographic Society to present Arctic Tale, Wednesday, March 26th, 2008, at 7:30 p.m. (doors at 7:00 p.m.) at the Brattle Theatre in Cambridge, MA.

We invite you (and your best friend who's still driving that rusty orange Pinto) to finally get rid of your old clunker, donate it, and live car-free with proceeds benefiting Habitat for Humanity Cars for Homes.

You don't need to donate a car to attend, but those Zipcar members and friends who register to do so will receive a free one-year Zipcar membership, $250 in driving credit, eligibility for a tax write-off, and much more. The first 20 to donate their cars will receive an additional $250 in driving credit, making it a total of $500!

So whether you just haven't caught the movie yet, you want to learn more about keeping Boston a less congested place to live, or you just want to thank your neighbor for going car-free and opening up a parking space in your neighborhood - it is going to be a fun night!

If you would like to attend or free yourself from car ownership, RSVP to rsvpBOS@zipcar.com with your name, number of attendees, and whether you would like to register to donate a vehicle.


Add this event to your Google or Outlook calendar
[Thanks Zipcar]

Saturday, March 22, 2008

D2E: DOWN:2:EARTH GREEN LIVING EXPO IN BOSTON

D2E, the Down:2:Earth sustainable living expo, March 28-30, 2008, at the Hynes Convention Center in Boston, MA. Everything from locally grown foods, learning how to compost at home, eco-wedding ideas, and even green home renovations can be found at the D2E. Panel discussions, food demonstrations by local chefs, and presentations by keynote speakers Bill McKibben and Frances Moore Lappe will educate and inspire attendees on going green.

Added bonus:
If you are a Zipcar member [and you should be!], you can take advantage of a discounted ticket price of $8, whether you buy your tickets at the door or pay in advance. Even bigger bonus for members, if you bring a friend, and s/he signs up for Zipcar at the expo, you'll get a $50 driving credit!




Add this event to your Google or Outlook calendar
[Thanks Zipcar for the heads up!]

Thursday, March 20, 2008

STARVING A DOG TO DEATH IS NOT ART

I am not 100% sure how to approach this without the onslaught of tears and emotion, but the pictures certainly reveal disturbingly enough the psychopathic lengths some people will go to call themselves artists. I don't even want this disgusting picture on my blog, except for the fact that it is important for people to feel outraged about this incident:

Costa-Rican "artist" [who shall herein be called "torturer" and a slew of other unkind words] Guillermo Vargas "Habacuc" tied a poor, stray dog up in a gallery space in Managua, Nicaragua, in late 2007, to let it starve to death as an exhibition, in view of people and within smelling range of food, but out of reach of anything but suffering.

According to Popgive, where I first learned about this story, the torturer paid two children to help him catch the dog on the street, and the dog later died in the gallery. After a deluge of messages and petitions, the gallery later denied that the dog had died, saying that it escaped, although that does not coincide with a later statement from the torturer, quoted as saying, "[The dog] was a very sick creature and would have died anyway. [citation]" There seems to be a bit of a contradiction in that statement.

Herein lies the contradiction:
The gallery, clearly stating the opposite of what viewers and witnesses have said, sent out a letter, in the form of a press-release, claiming that the dog had "escaped" and had not died:

"One of the exposed works consisted of presenting/displaying a famélico dog that Habacuc gathered off the street, and during the exhibition he appeared moored with a nylon cord, that was subject as well to another cord that hung of[f] two nails in a corner of the Gallery. Hab[a]cuc named the dog "Natividad" in tribute to the Nicaraguan Natividad Canda (24 years) that died devoured by two Rottweiler dogs in a factory of San Jose, Costa Rica, the dawn of Thursday 10 of November of 2005. The dog remained in the premises three days, from the 5 pm afternoon of Wednesday 15 of August [2007]. He was loose all along in the inner patio, except the 3 hours that the sample lasted, was fed regularly with dog food that the same Hab[a]cuc brought. Surprise, to the dawn of Friday 17, the dog escaped happening through the iron doors of the main entrance of the building, while the nocturnal watchman who finished feeding cleaned [...] the outer sidewalk [...]. [sic] [citation]"

Yet, Vargas, in his own words, stated this about the exhibit:

"Hello everyone. My name is Guillermo Vargas Habacuc. I am 50 years old and an artist. Recently, I have been criticized for my work titled "Eres lo que lees," which features a dog named Nativity. The purpose of the work was not to cause any type of infliction on the poor, innocent creature, but rather to illustrate a point. In my home city of San Jose, Costa Rica, tens of thousands of stray dogs starve and die of illness each year in the streets and no one pays them a second thought. Now, if you publicly display one of these starving creatures, such as the case with Nativity, it creates a backlash that brings out a bi[t] of hypocrisy in all of us. Nativity was a very sick creature and would have died in the streets anyway. [citation]"

Hmm... I think the hypocrisy of which he speaks starts here. Quite a contradiction from what the gallery owner was saying: she said the dog was fed, he says the dog was starved; she says the dog escaped, he quite clearly comments on the fact that the dog has died. Someone here is covering her butt and someone here is a delusional motherfucker.

I have also found another contradiction, while bobbing amongst blog entries and news stories to dig out the facts, and that is how Vargas acquired the dog. While Popgive says he paid two kids to help him catch the dog [and they got their information from this blog], another site I found said that "[He] allegedly found the dog tied up on a street corner in a poor Nicaragua barrio, [citation]" which of course raises the question of whether or not the dog may have belonged to someone. This thought, to me, just adds insult to injury, that there is the possibility he may have taken someone's dog in the name of "art."

According to For The Love of the Dog, a news/information blog about canines, Vargas' exhibition included a note spelled out in dog food that said, "You are what you read" and an incense burner burning marijuana and crack cocaine. Nice. Really fucking awesome.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer says Vargas has a substantial career in Central America. He won an honorable mention in the Central American Biennial 2006 before this controversial dog torture exhibit took place. Post-exhibit there is an international outcry against him, along with a petition claiming over 300,000+ signatures screaming for the Biennial to change its plans to have him show again at the 2008 event.

This event has caused quite a stir and anti-animal cruelty groups are rightfully out to get justice for Vargas's actions. I say take the gallery down in flames, too. What kind of gallery -- a place of art, of richness in spirit and culture, of respect and understanding of beauty, pain, and suffering on levels unimaginable unless you behold them -- would allow this type of exhibit and allow it to be called art? Now granted, art is not something tangible you can define with borders or vocabulary words, and the torturer may be trying to make a point for a cause that is equally as painful and ugly as this torturous act itself, but neither of those justify the suffering and death of any innocent creature. As far as I am concerned, with 300,000+ people to back me on this one -- and I'm sure well more than that once their eyes have been opened -- this is animal cruelty in the ugliest degree, and I expect, no, demand, that this guy is prosecuted and the gallery is at least fined, if not prosecuted, as well. A gallery that would house such an awful act of torture does not deserve to call itself a gallery and does disrespect to those of us who create and respect true art.

Please, for the sake of art, sign the petition.

For information about where the gallery is located and sample letters you can write to the gallery in protest, please read the post and petitions here. This site has lots of information on it, including updates on where you can protest this "artist's" shows at other galleries, news on the topic from around the world, and a discussion about the treatment of the dog.

And if this post has prompted you to feel more than you wanted to feel for this poor, innocent dog, please consider adopting one of the thousands that need homes. Here are a couple places to start: Save A Dog, Abandoned Pet Rescue, Petfinder, Humane Society, find your own in a web search -- there are hundreds.





[Photo 1 credit link]
[Photo 2 credit link]

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

THORN TO BE WILD: YOUNG SEATTLE FILMMAKERS MAKE AN ENVIRONMENTAL DIFFERENCE

THORN TO BE WILD, the short film commissioned by the Nature Consortium [an organization working hard to restore Seattle's largest forests] and produced and directed by a team of high-school students is being screened at Youngstown Cultural Arts Center in Seattle, WA, on Saturday, March 22, 2008. 7 p.m. PST. No cover charge.

There will be live music by the band The Lonely Forest and, of course, cupcakes :). They will screen the short (10 min) and a "making of" edited together by the students (6 min). The students will conduct a Q&A session at the end of the screening, and music will follow for the rest of the evening.

And here's another great link to find out more about urban forest management in Seattle.


Add this event to your Google or Outlook calendar.

Sunday, March 16, 2008

GREEN THINKER OF THE MONTH ARCHIVES

Waste Management [Featured 3.1.08]

THE STORY OF STUFF - AWESOME VIDEO YOU MUST SEE

This teaser trailer is only the beginning. Please go to the site and watch the full video; it really is tremendously well done. Get involved in something good in this world. Stop the consumerism mentality cycle. Please do your part.



PLEASE WATCH THE REST OF THIS VIDEO.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

GET BLUE SPRUCE TREES SUPER CHEAP - LIMITED SPECIAL OFFER

I am all about passing good deals along, especially when they concern helping the environment. I received a coupon in the mail that is an awesome offer, too good to pass up, except that I can't use it myself, so I want it to go to someone who can.

Here is the deal:
Colorado Blue Spruce
4-year old, 1-2' tall
3 for $5.50, 6 for $10.95, or 12 for $19.95
PLUS 2 free Burning Bushes with your order
and only $1.95 shipping and handling

THAT IS AN AWESOME DEAL!!
3 trees and 2 large red bushes mailed to you for only $7.50 total!!

Details: This versatile Blue Spruce makes a lovely single accent planting, privacy row or windbreak, and colorful corner grouping. You'll receive select, nicely-branched 4-year old transplanted trees that are at least 1-2' tall. Having been transplanted, the root system is well developed and will help the tree get off to a fast start.

The Burning Bush has the most brilliant red foliage of any shrub. Fiery red leaves of the Burning Bush are so spectacular in Fall that they look like a bush on fire. 2 free with a Blue Spruce order!

These are from Burgess Seed & Plant Co. in Illinois, which has great, great prices year round, but this offer is a special one, with free plants and a great shipping price!

I have ONE of these coupons/order forms, and ONLY ONE. If you want it, it is yours. I will mail it to the first person who emails me his/her mailing address and says s/he wants it. Please make sure you will plant the trees and that the trees can grow in your climate. Must be in the United States.


[Photo credit link]

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

EARTH LIBERATION FRONT: ECOTERRORISM DOES EQUALLY AS MUCH DAMAGE

On Monday, March 3, 2008, in Woodinville, Washington, near Seattle, a fire believed to be the ecoterrorist work of the ELF [Earth Liberation Front] engulfed many $2 million dollar homes on the famous "Street of Dreams."

Read more about the fire on CNN and a great article on Seattle's King 5.

Although it has not yet been proven whether the fires were caused by the ELF, it is definite that they are the work of ecoterrorism: signs reading "Built green? Nope black!", using references such as "McMansion," and bearing the letters ELF, most likely the initials of the Earth Liberation Front, were found at the site, and suspicious explosive devices were found inside and near the homes.

So, now I'm going to rant about ecoterrrorism. If you are too quote unquote green to see beyond the end of your nose and lighter, then you may not want to read on, because I am about to insult you. Although you should read on, because I am about to make you smarter.

I have had enough of hippies with fucking lighters and the idea that massive air pollution and endangering lives is the way to get your green message across. I am all for being green, don't get me wrong; I do all kinds of educational things to teach others the green way, and I am careful to implement them in my own home, office, work space, business practices, and daily life.

But what does burning accomplish? First of all, the owners will rebuild the homes. The arsonists have only destroyed a physical thing that can and will be rebuilt. This means TWICE the usage of trees and materials, destruction of forests and resources...because of the arsonists, not helped by the arsonists. This means TWICE as much gas, fuel, power, energy, emissions used by machinery to rebuild. And let's not forget the machinery that first has to FURTHER DESTROY what you have destroyed, which will equal almost FOUR, FIVE, SIX TIMES the gas, fuel, power, energy, emissions to flatten the homes down to foundations, remove the debris, and start the rebuilding process again.

Second of all, these fires were supposedly in retaliation to claims that the houses were built green, something the ecoterrorists apparently didn't believe, based on the sign found at the scene. My question is: Why are you retaliating against someone who is trying to take steps to be greener? Okay, maybe the houses aren't perfectly green, but one of the people involved in the 2007 Street of Dreams said the homes used "Built Green" standards such as water-pervious sidewalks, super-insulated walls and windows, and products made with recycled materials, such as carpet pads. Advertising for last summer's Street of Dreams focused on the environmentally friendly aspects of the homes, which were smaller than some of the huge houses featured in years past.

"The environmental part of the house was a passion of mine," said Grey Lundberg, a builder of one of the houses. "We've put a lot into this house." Lundberg said he cannot understand why an environmental group would strike the home he built. It incorporated the latest in eco-friendly standards and even won environmental awards.

So maybe the homes aren't 100% everything green we could ever want, but I don't have water-pervious sidewalks or super-insulated walls and windows to conserve energy in my house... so small steps are better than none at all. Why are these the people a group would want to retaliate against, while there are so many worse things going on in the world? Not to mention the fact that the Street of Dreams supports two awesome charities: the Children's Home Society of Washington and the Make-A-Wish Foundation of the Northwest.

And what about when you're wrong? At the same time these fires were going on, a federal jury in Tacoma, Washington, was deliberating in the case of another accused ELF activist, Briana Waters, who could face at least 35 years if convicted of helping to firebomb the University of Washington's Center for Urban Horticulture in 2001, which caused $7 million in damage. The horticulture center was targeted because the ELF activists MISTAKENLY believed researchers there were genetically engineering trees. Think about this: a supposed eco group BOMBED a HORTICULTURE center! What are they thinking? I seriously hope she spends those 35 years so she can think about the stupidity of this action, which takes me to my final and, in my opinion, most important, statement:

When you burn something, do you have ANY IDEA how much carbon you are releasing into the air? Here are a few stats for you: A wildfire can release enough carbon dioxide into the atmosphere that it can match an entire state's ANNUAL vehicle emissions in a few weeks [citation]. Every year, fires burn 3 million to 4 million square kilometers of Earth’s land surface area, and release more than a billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide [citation]. These ecoterrorists, and no, I don't mind using that term at all, are causing at least equal to, if not more than, the amount of damage caused from just building the house in the first place. These carbon emissions pollute the air, destroy foliage and fresh water, and damage our lungs, livers, and brains. So what's the use in trading in one evil for another? What does that prove? What does that teach people? That you are an asshole? That you can cause a little stir for a little while that doesn't really solve anything or get any actions or solutions implemented, other than your jail time? That causing your own environmental damage, possible injuries to firefighters and bystanders, and pollution to the air and earth is okay if YOU do it, but not if someone else does it? You can't cherrypick environmental damage; you are either defending it peacefully, or you are just as much a part of the problem.

And last, but not least, my final rant: hypocrisy. It is the one thing I cannot ignore in people who talk louder than they should. So the ELF News website has ads for Prescription Free Viagra, the Florida Swinger's Convention, and Download Shield to allow you to download copyrighted software from the Internet. My favorite part is where they talk about not having to deal with all that Corporate bullshit (brought to you by the Internet Pharmacy). In the words of one of my favorite columnist /bloggers /ranters, Marni Soupcoff on Full Comment: "[If] environmentalists are going to go around risking lives and trampling on property rights in the name of Mother Earth, then the least they could do is shell out a couple of dollars to protect their own domain name and make a bit of an effort to get their message across." [Check out Marni's take on this subject, too; she rocks.]

That is all I have to say about this. I could rant forever, but I am too angry to do so, and I couldn't change any more minds if they are already set on the irony of destruction of the Earth in an "effort" to preserve it.

----------
Take REAL ACTION that makes a difference:

The Building Industry Association of Washington and the FBI are offering a $100,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible for this crime. Anyone who has knowledge of these fires is asked to call the Arson Hotline (800-55-ARSON) or contact authorities. Callers may remain anonymous.


[Anything not directly cited came from one of the links on this page, and you can find the source for yourself. Picture from King 5.]